Firstly, I wrote this…
![angry](http://67.20.76.166/~alistair/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/angry-249x300.jpg)
Outside Taupo Youth Court no-one wants to give their name, inside most names have to remain secret.
Everything about the accused is suppressed except this: he is 16, a male, and will be back in this room on January 12. He does not want to apply for bail. He wears a T-shirt and has bare feet.
The victim is five and foreign, her family surrounded now by an aching love that renders $52,000 and counting and more teddy bears and flowers than can be kept.
She was attacked while she slept in a caravan at Turangi’s Club Habitat motor camp on December 21.
There is a crowd interested in the teen, too. Many are right by the side gate, bolshie and mouthy. They call him a paedophile and an animal and tell him he will be judged.
“It was a five-year-old-girl,” yells one simply – hate in the tone. One wishes for rotten fruit and veg, she’s never done this before. “Evil” is her verdict.
A couple came from Palmerston North “to see what a piece of s..t looks like”. There is talk of the death penalty. He has a small camcorder up a big sleeve, the footage due for some website.
Another woman shyly receives congratulations on yelling something particularly cutting, but takes off with her little dog before she can be questioned.
Then there are others across the road among the trees. Just standing, quiet, arms folded. It is unnatural and spine-pricking primal. They stare bullets. There are big corn-fed police on the front door and they ignore the side noise and flat stare straight back into the tree people, unblinking.
Family and whanau are there too and have nothing to say. It is a funeral to them. Mum looks like she can’t believe it is happening. Someone yells for some kids to shut up, “f… ya”.
One guy looks so much like prison he’s only lacking a white paper suit. He seems best avoided until he approaches and starts asking questions. He is not about the accused, he is here to support the little girl’s family, he’s local Tu Whare Toa Iwi and hoping his community is going to be safe over the rest of the holiday.
A young couple have a baby in their back seat, a massive yellow super-soaker propped next to him. They are from Turangi, have rumours that can’t be repeated but seem plausible.
They are shocked their town (a Mongrel Mob “retirement village” where they believe their cousins occasionally stabbing each other is not that awful) could birth something this dank.
Another local tells us the “perpetrator” of the crime is filthy and disgusting. But in the worst thing to happen today, qualifies it. “Who,” she says, “goes to another country and leaves kids on their own?”
Pre-show, Detective Inspector Mark Loper had a word. He had the usual praise for hard work and a quick catch, but then went off script. “New Zealand society needs to have a good look at itself,” he said.
It’s over and the media are leaving and the cops are disappearing but the family huddle together on one seat outside the court. Seeming not to know what to do next.
Just above them the New Zealand flag has ripped and hung up on one edge of its pole. It fills, billowing in the wind, reaching up into a light that brightens the grey clouds only at the top, like it wants to set sail to somewhere far away.
Then, this happened …
Case Number: 2237 ANDY BOREHAM AGAINST WAIKATO TIMES
Council Meeting MARCH 2012
Andy Boreham complains about a Waikato Times account of the mood and character of a crowd outside the Taupo Youth Court when a teenager appeared on a charge of sexually violating a five-year-old girl. The complaint is not upheld.
Background
The crime, committed at a Turangi motor camp on a child of visitors to New Zealand just before Christmas, 2011, attracted intense national interest before the youth was charged. On the day of his first appearance almost everything about him was suppressed and the Waikato Times devoted most of its report to a description of the crowd outside.
The Complaint
Andy Boreham complains that the report contains language and assertions that are clearly matters of opinion but are presented as fact. Specifically, he cites references to the victim’s family being surrounded by an “aching love” and to “big corn-fed policemen on the front door”. One onlooker was described as “so much like prison he’s only lacking a white suit.” and “best avoided until he approaches and starts asking questions”. A couple were said to be voicing “rumours that can’t be repeated but seem plausible.”
Mr Boreham accuses the newspaper of presenting opinion as fact, offending standards of accuracy, fairness and balance and making a discriminatory statement that a person looked “like prison” before it reported that he was of the “local Tu Whare Toa Iwi”.
Mr Boreham believed the article was endorsing anti-social behaviour and was irresponsible. He cited a reference to one angry onlooker having a camcorder up his sleeve, presumably to post pictures of the accused on a website.
He considered the unattributable views of onlookers had no place in professional, impartial news stories. This one, he believed, suggested the public are entitled to take the law into their own hands.
The Newspaper’s Response
The editor not only stood by the story but described it as “a fine piece of journalism”. It was in no way inaccurate or unbalanced. He expected his reporters to include some “colour” of significant news events such as this.
“We rely on reporters to be the eyes and ears for our readers,” he said. At no time had the reporter expressed a view on the accused or the case. He said, “Mr Boreham mistakes colour for opinion”.
The Decision
The best factual reporting is not insensate. The reporter’s job is not just to count numbers in a crowd or listen to what might be said. A good reporter can give a reader a sense of what it is like to be there. A well-written story uses acute factual observation to convey what a fair and impartial observer would see, hear and think.
Waikato Times reporter Alistair Bone has achieved all of this exceptionally well, in the Council’s view.
The passages that Mr Boreham labels opinion are the reporter’s impressions and this would have been evident to readers. There was no risk that comment would be confused for fact.
Mr Boreham finds one particular passage discriminatory. It reads. “One guy looks so much like prison he is only lacking a white paper suit. He seems best avoided until he approaches and starts asking questions.” But the rest of the paragraph puts quite a different complexion on that observation. It continues: “He is not about the accused, he is here to support the little girl’s family, he’s local Tu Whare Toa Iwi and hoping his community is going to be safe over the rest of the holiday.”
Mr Boreham sees an anti-social tone in the whole article. The council reads it quite differently. In the passage just quoted the reporter is cleverly using a prejudgment of his own to show how wrong prejudice can be.
Far from suggesting the public are entitled to take the law into their own hands, the article clearly conveys the ugliness of some of the sentiments without losing sympathy for the crowd’s horror at the crime.
In the Council’s view the article is not only balanced, fair and responsible, it is a fine piece of journalism, a credit to the reporter and his newspaper. The complaint is not upheld.
Press Council members considering this complaint were Barry Paterson, Pip Bruce Ferguson, Kate Coughlan, Chris Darlow, Sandy Gill, Penny Harding, Keith Lees, Clive Lind, John Roughan, Lynn Scott and Stephen Stewart.
Which led to this…
Complaint over story not upheld
The Press Council has not upheld a complaint about how the Waikato Times covered the court appearance of a child rapist.
The complaint was about Raurangi Marino’s first court appearance in Taupo earlier this year. An angry crowd had gathered outside Taupo District Court to catch a glimpse of the 16-year-old, who later admitted to raping a 5-year-old girl in a Turangi motorcamp. It was a crime that shocked the country.
However, Andy Boreham complained that the story blended fact and opinion, was racist, inaccurate and unbalanced.
In response Waikato Times’ editor Jonathan MacKenzie said the story, written by Alistair Bone, “was a fine piece of journalism”.
In a rare move the Press Council chose to name Mr Bone in its adjudication.
“The best factual reporting is not insensate,” the council said.
“The reporter’s job is not just to count numbers in a crowd or listen to what might be said. A good reporter can give a reader a sense of what it is like to be there. A well-written story uses acute factual observation to convey what a fair and impartial observer would see, hear and think.
“Waikato Times reporter Alistair Bone has achieved all of this exceptionally well, in the council’s view.
“In the council’s view the article is not only balanced, fair and responsible, it is a fine piece of journalism, a credit to the reporter and his newspaper.”
Which was nice, and led to this …
JOURNALIST ACCUSED OF BEING ‘EXCEPTIONAL’
In recognition – and celebration – of the Press Council refusing to uphold a complaint against legendary Hamilton journalist Alistair Bone, the judges and convenor of New Zealand’s most coveted media award have awarded the latest prize to the Waikato Times feature writer.
Bone becomes the 20th winner of the Alcohol Sponsorship Press Awards (ASP), now in its sixth month.
News of the Press Council’s decision was a triumph for quality journalism, said awards convenor and Metro hack Steve Braunias.
“Bone is one of the very best newspaper feature writers in New Zealand, definitely better than anyone in Auckland or Wellington.”
“His piece about the child rapist’s appearance at the district court in Taupo was superb. Bravo to the Press Council for their comments.
“We note in passing that when it was published in January, Bone’s story was sneered at in public by a bunch of B-grade media bums. Pah.”
Bone will receive a bottle of award-winning STOLEN Rum (in choice of white or gold variant) as his prize.
![rum](http://67.20.76.166/~alistair/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/rum.jpg)